Back to Insights
Operational Strategy

How Health Plans Can Modernize Without Disruption

A practical look at how health plans can modernize operations without creating disruption—and why getting the foundation right is critical to lasting change.

Jon Murphy and Kevin DeLury
August 28, 2026

For health plans, modernization is no longer optional. Rising costs, member expectations, workforce constraints and increasingly complex technology environments are forcing organizations to rethink how work gets done.

But modernization can easily create the very thing leaders are trying to eliminate: more friction.

Large implementations stretch teams, timelines slip and new platforms get layered onto broken processes. The organization may end up with more technology, but not necessarily better operations.

The better approach is to modernize methodically: understand the problem, fix the operating model behind it and sequence change so the business can keep running while the work becomes more efficient.

Start with the workflow, not the technology

Health plans often talk about modernization in terms of better member experience, greater automation or lower costs. But underneath those goals is usually a workflow problem.

People may be moving between multiple systems to complete one transaction. Data doesn’t move cleanly. Manual workarounds become part of day-to-day operations.

Replacing the technology alone rarely solves that. Put a new platform on top of broken workflows, poor data or unclear processes and you’ve recreated the same problem, just in a shinier system.

Before investing, ask:

  • What problem are we actually trying to solve?
  • Where does the current workflow break down?
  • What can we improve with what we already have?
  • Is this really a technology problem, or a process, governance or accountability problem?

Modernization is often less about finding one system that does everything and more about reducing friction between the systems, people and processes already in place.

Before asking whether the vendor is ready, ask whether you are

One of the most overlooked causes of implementation trouble is internal readiness.

Vendors might be waiting for documented workflows, approved policies, usable data or decisions the health plan itself hasn’t resolved. When those inputs aren’t ready, timelines slip and the technology often takes the blame.

Before asking whether a vendor can deliver, make sure the organization can give that vendor what it needs to succeed.

That means understanding the current state, documenting key processes, surfacing manual workarounds and establishing clear ownership. It also means having an executive sponsor who can remove roadblocks and keep the work moving.

As ClearTurn Managing Director Jon Murphy often tells clients, a vision only becomes actionable when the people responsible for delivering it know what they need to do each day to move it forward. When employees log in every morning, do they have clear tasks that connect back to the larger transformation? That’s where vision becomes execution.

Bring the people closest to the work into the process

Frontline employees usually know exactly where the friction lives. They know which systems don’t communicate, which processes require unnecessary handoffs and which “official” workflows have quietly been replaced by something else.

Bring those people into modernization early. The right frontline employees can help identify the real problems and become trusted change agents when new processes go live.

But listening doesn’t mean endless consensus building. Teams need a safe way to surface concerns, while leadership maintains clear decision rights and accountability.

That balance is often easier with an experienced third party in the room.

Treat change management as part of the work

Modernization doesn’t end when a new system goes live.

Leaders need to understand how the change will affect employees, members, providers and partners, then communicate with each group accordingly.

That’s particularly important when teams are already stretched thin. Modernization can initially feel like one more project on an overflowing plate.

The message needs to be clear: the short-term effort is designed to make the long-term work easier by removing manual processes, unnecessary escalations and operational friction.

And once the change is live, watch both the hard and soft signals. Turnaround time, accuracy, adoption, budget and member feedback matter. So do team confidence, resistance and rising escalation. Those softer signals are often the earliest indication that something is starting to break.

If the project is red, report it red

Not every modernization effort goes according to plan.

When an implementation starts slipping, leaders need to acknowledge it quickly rather than protect the status of the project.

Determine what’s actually wrong. Is it the vendor? The technology? Or are unresolved workflows, decisions or internal alignment creating the problem?  Address the root cause and then course correct to get the project back to green.

The goal is to surface issues early enough that they can be resolved before they create larger operational disruption. 

Invest upfront so you can move faster later

Most modernization efforts have real deadlines. That makes thoughtful planning more important, not less.

The strongest roadmaps invest enough time upfront to understand the problem, align the organization and make key decisions before execution begins. That preparation helps teams move faster once implementation is underway and reduces the likelihood of avoidable rework.

  • Diagnose. Get clear on the problem, understand the current environment, identify dependencies, define the solution architecture and establish executive sponsorship.
  • Design. Build the roadmap, determine sequencing, establish governance, align the right teams and begin change-management planning.
  • Mobilize. Kick off the work with clear ownership, success measures, communication and the right operational support in place.

The exact timing will vary. A focused initiative may move through these stages quickly, while a complex transformation may require significantly more time.

The principle is the same: invest the time to get the foundation right so the organization can execute faster, with fewer surprises, against the deadline that matters.

Why the right partner matters

Some modernization problems are difficult to diagnose from inside the organization.

Internal politics shape what gets said. Teams have existing assumptions and investments. Leaders may see the symptoms without having enough distance to identify the root cause.

A trusted third party can bring objectivity while creating a safer channel for people to say what’s really happening.

ClearTurn combines that outside perspective with deep operator experience. Its team has worked inside health plans, led complex implementations and seen where transformations succeed and where they break.

That experience helps ClearTurn distinguish a technology problem from an operating problem, challenge assumptions early and stay embedded through execution rather than handing over a strategy deck and walking away.

Modernization will never be completely frictionless. But disruption shouldn’t be the price of progress.

Done thoughtfully, modernization should make the organization more stable, more efficient and easier to operate than it was before.

Ready to modernize without creating more operational friction?

ClearTurn helps health plans diagnose what’s really getting in the way, build practical modernization roadmaps and stay alongside teams through implementation.

Talk to ClearTurn about where to start.